Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Wealth Distribution under Capitalism by Party9999999 Wealth Distribution under Capitalism by Party9999999
Thank you rich kids of instargram for you contribution to the class struggle.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconmxm777:
mxm777 Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2015  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
right
Reply
:iconhk-0391:
HK-0391 Featured By Owner Jan 16, 2015   Digital Artist
Everyone reading this comment, get up, go and get some popcorn, and scroll down to watch the shit-storm unfold.
Reply
:iconhk-0391:
HK-0391 Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2015   Digital Artist
Thank you, past me! I needed a pick-me-up today.
Reply
:iconhk-0391:
HK-0391 Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2015   Digital Artist
No problem, future me!
Reply
:iconoriginalczechball:
originalCzechball Featured By Owner Jan 10, 2015
Communist elite stole money from working class and lives in luxury, remember Nicolae Ceaușescu?
Reply
:iconsoulessone12:
soulessone12 Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014
shoot is the guy in the bottom center going to drink all that?
Reply
:iconparty9999999:
Party9999999 Featured By Owner Nov 30, 2014
Swim in it more like.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Sep 10, 2014  Hobbyist
Someone earned that money. If not them then their fathers, or their grand fathers. Point is somewhere down the line someone worked their ass of to become rich. THATS Capitalism. Those with vision and drive end up at the top. Those that simply want to clock in and clock out everyday don't.
Reply
:iconcochegara:
Cochegara Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2014
Most of rich bastards of XIX century just stolen money from state budget.
Most of rich bastards of XXI century just recieved same money in form of subsidies.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2014  Hobbyist
They received those because they built successful companies that our economy needs in order to function.
Reply
:iconmoxc:
MOxC Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2015  Student Artisan Crafter
A successful company that is integral to the economy should not need subsidies or bailouts. 
Reply
:iconcochegara:
Cochegara Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2014
And they are still repeat this "we are hardworkers" bullshit.
This cowards just can't face the truth.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2014  Hobbyist
You have no idea how economy s work do you? 
Reply
:iconcochegara:
Cochegara Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2014
It works like this: we produce, you consume.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2014  Hobbyist
I produce as well the rise I would have no money with which to consume.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2014  Hobbyist
I produce as well though. Otherwise j would have no money with which to consume. 
Reply
:iconcochegara:
Cochegara Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2014
White-collar? Produces?
:D
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconjarreltheluckyone:
Jarreltheluckyone Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2014
"I don't like socialists (politicians of socialist party?) Because they are not socialists." C. Degaulle.
Reply
:iconludoms:
ludoms Featured By Owner Jul 30, 2014
"capitalism is the exploitation of men by men, syndicalism is the inverse" M.Colucci (AKA Coluche)
Reply
:iconjarreltheluckyone:
Jarreltheluckyone Featured By Owner Jul 31, 2014
He was so right! pffff! If he see the world of today.... :-/
Reply
:iconborchenstein:
Borchenstein Featured By Owner May 25, 2014
very true
Reply
:iconopinionsprofile:
OpinionsProfile Featured By Owner May 13, 2014
That's pretty much exactly what it is.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner May 12, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
The free market is about free trade and the creation of wealth. Socialism always fails after they run out of other people's money to steal.
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Jul 17, 2015
Capitalism always fails when it runs out of other peoples' money.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner Jul 17, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Except in a free market system, people are free to generate their own wealth. You're free to invest freely and then, if the venture is successful, you turn a profit. It's not like Socialism where people who work too hard or not hard enough are arrested by the secret police for attempting to undermine the party, thereby scaring people out of doing anything that might make them stand out, like inventing things.
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Jul 17, 2015
No, in a free market system you are free to rob people of the full value of their labour. It's not generating you're own wealth if the entire basis is making other people work, and not paying them the full value of what they do. That's called using other peoples' money.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner Jul 17, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Your thinking of socialism. In that system, all your labor belongs to the state and when they take it, you're lucky if they don't send you to the goulag for not thanking them enough.

System based on making other people work? Is there such a thing as a system that doesn't have other people doing work. I know the meat cutters at the deli can't do crap unless drivers deliver the meat.

And you know they're not being paid the value of their labor... because you were properly indoctrinated? The whole point of the free market is supply meeting demand. Workers want to be paid as much as possible while employers want to pay as little as possible, and they meet somewhere in the middle and all have maximum satisfaction. Or we could just pay menial workers $1000 an hour and then the business goes under. 
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2015
Apart from the obvious flaws with that statement, no I'm definitely thinking of Capitalism. Capitalism is wear someone exploits you, and if you don't get exploited you either are an exploiter, or you starve to death. 

Right, so you said something completely different to what I said. What you pointed out is called "team work". What I was pointing out was "someone else making money of someone else's work". EG, I make 10 guys produce PC's and make another guy sell them. The profits go to me, and I pay the people working. I am doing nothing, and getting much more money than the other 11 guys. I am making other people generate my wealth. 

Because if they were being paid the full value of their labour then the employer wouldn't be making a profit, and the actual working people would be a lot richer than the business owners. And I really don't see your point, the real menial workers (CEO's and such, who sit around doing effectively nothing) get paid much more than a grand an hour.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
The free market is people trading without the state pointing a gun at them telling them what to do. That right there is exploitation. But maybe there's a world beyond master and slave. Maybe it's possible for people to agree to work together out of a sense of mutual need? Nah. That'd be silly.

So basically you believe that work can exist without a hierarchy? Apparently the Soviets disagreed with you because Stalin was on top of pretty much everything and murdered everyone he didn't like. His crimes against humanity would have made Hitler blush if he'd lived long enough to see them.

And the profit goes back into the business so it can expand, hire more workers, produce more product, thereby making an even greater profit to pay even more workers and thus the standard of living is raised as more and more people are employed. That's how it's worked for Africa with fewer and fewer people each year living off less than a dollar a day. Gradual improvement. As opposed to just stealing from the rich, distributing it amongst the poor, minus the fee taken by those in power. It works really great for one year, but after that there's nothing left to redistribute so the state just focuses on lowering the standard of living.

Tell me. If you system is so much better, why doesn't it exist? It's been tried numerous times, but it always fails some time after the death camps are built. And why the compulsion to murder countless men, women, and children anyway? Not cool www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjY4jQ…

Also, why are you arguing with me on this? I've seen evidence that socialism fails. Besides the human rights violations, there's also this little thing called the tragedy of commons. Then there's the warping of culture to make everyone distrust each other so that no one will think of teaming up against the tyranny of the state. I've seen the evidence. You saying that CEOs make more money than me isn't going to win me over to your cause.
Reply
:iconnonestar:
NoneStar Featured By Owner May 24, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Yay a smart person.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner May 24, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Nope. Just a guy quoting other smart people.
Reply
:iconnonestar:
NoneStar Featured By Owner May 24, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Well you have to be smart to quote someone smart, else you would quote someone that wasn't. :P
Reply
:icongeminisaga5:
geminisaga5 Featured By Owner Jun 30, 2014  Student
Hope you know that Einstein disagree's with that.
Reply
:icondaneofscandinavy:
DaneOfScandinavy Featured By Owner May 12, 2014
Well, people living off of welfare aren't working hard....
Reply
:icondaisrunbybigots:
DAisrunbybigots Featured By Owner May 12, 2014
Reply
:iconninjawerr:
ninjawerr Featured By Owner May 10, 2014  Professional Writer
And your thinking corperationisum, not capitalism. 
Reply
:iconjoeisbadass:
joeisbadass Featured By Owner May 10, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Socialism isn't about everyone getting equal wealth then, because that's exactly what motivates people like Obama to take wealth from the rich and give it to the poor: Socialism
Reply
:icondarkriderdlmc:
DarkRiderDLMC Featured By Owner May 12, 2014
But he fails to share HIS wealth, even with family members past wife and kids.  And he prefers to share your wealth with wife and kids :D
Reply
:iconjoeisbadass:
joeisbadass Featured By Owner May 12, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
Well unless your poor, and you get used to the poverty 'cause Obama's fluffing your pillow and feeding you bacon ;)
Reply
:icondarkriderdlmc:
DarkRiderDLMC Featured By Owner May 12, 2014
Yeah, but that's not really sharing.

One of MammaObama's vacations would feed a poor food stamp recipient for better than 1500 years.  And they take a lot of vacations.

Obama cost 1.5 billion in upkeep in 2012, about an 8oth of the annual food stamp cost.  Add the cost of all the other oinking politicians and food stamps and feeding the poor to stop them from robbing you is cheaper than feeding the politicians to stop them from robbing you.

And the poor rob you less often.
Reply
:iconjoeisbadass:
joeisbadass Featured By Owner May 12, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
:iconobamaplz: Well uhhhh... it is uhhhh sharing uhhhh it helps for equality and uhhhhh universal healthcare


But in all seriousness, it is sharing, just in a coercive and totalitarian sort of way. Mix the concept of sharing with politics and you have socialism.
Reply
:iconvladimirseyer:
VladimirSeyer Featured By Owner Dec 7, 2013
in Socialism,there is no Greedy Rich people nor poor people,everything is the same,Ignorant Capitalist.
Reply
:iconoverrated-relish:
Overrated-Relish Featured By Owner Mar 3, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
IN pratice though that doesn't work. people need insentive to work hard, and natuarlly we are greedy people, but that doesn't mean we cannot take care of people. Don't get me wrong I think far right wing capitalism is wrong on so many levels but so is far left wing socialists, I think the best is in the middle. If one takes the freedom and opportunity in capitalism and takes the humanitartian spending and caring of socialism you have the best possible government.
Reply
:iconschmittlenin:
SchmittLenin Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2014
Freedom and opportunity to oppress people? I'd rather die. Also, stop saying that Socialism and Communism are against human nature! It's not because it's in our nature that we can't control it...
Reply
:iconoverrated-relish:
Overrated-Relish Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Congratulations you just made 0 sense. I am ten points dumber from reading what you just said.
Reply
:iconninjawerr:
ninjawerr Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2013  Professional Writer

the same can be said for both, (capitalisum and comunisum) however the rich don't stay rich in capitalisum unless they are fair and just to there employies, and that includes helping them generate weath as well. in socalisum its work to make me rich or die.

 

what does that do to your argument?

 

Don't beleve me? read a history book on the two topics then agure your point.

 

 

 

Reply
:iconsoyom:
Soyom Featured By Owner Oct 17, 2013
Actually, he's right about capitalism. All the wealth that hard-working people have (and when I say hard-working, I include CEO) goes to the banks to feed a lot of financial parasites who makes a lot of money through speculation (which is not hard work, it's barely work at all). For example, in the USA, all the taxes people pays (and there's a lot of taxes in the USA) goes directly to the Federal Reserve, which is a private bank, because of the public dept.

Socialism have a lot of problems too, that's far from being a secret. ;)
Reply
:iconninjawerr:
ninjawerr Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2013  Professional Writer
then you do not know true capitalisum. if you want more detales plese respond
Reply
:iconsoyom:
Soyom Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2013
You're right. I was talking about financial capitalism, which is the system used by most nations today. But classical capitalism doesn't work like that, and numerous figures of classical capitalism (well, at least Henry Ford and Thomas Jefferson, I'm not sure for the others) where totally opposed to financial capitalism.
But in my country (France), we never enjoyed classical capitalism. After the fall of the monarchy, there was a direct switch to financial capitalism (because most of the philosophers of the enlightenment promoted it, especially Voltaire). This is why I didn't thought about classical capitalism at first. This is also why I wouldn't say no to more informations on the subject.
Reply
:iconninjawerr:
ninjawerr Featured By Owner Oct 21, 2013  Professional Writer

we enjoyed it briefly over here in my country (America) Following the new deal, the real end to it was fine print in the act that created the EPA.

 

Goes to show you we need to create guidelines for our laws or they shouldn't become laws.

Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×
Download PNG 744 × 990




Details

Submitted on
September 27, 2013
Image Size
928 KB
Resolution
744×990
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
7,867 (5 today)
Favourites
142 (who?)
Comments
98
Downloads
28
×