Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Wealth Distribution under Capitalism by Party9999999 Wealth Distribution under Capitalism by Party9999999
Thank you rich kids of instargram for you contribution to the class struggle.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconzackaube:
zackaube Featured By Owner Jun 7, 2017
This is absolute nonsense.

You're deliberately switching the two around.
Unless you're claiming that wealthy people are wealthy as a direct result of theft. Which is asinine.
Reply
:iconspikedpsycho:
spikedpsycho Featured By Owner May 8, 2017
Socialism can only survive with a mass of pessimistic greedy people.
Reply
:iconvladiverse:
Vladiverse Featured By Owner Edited Apr 11, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
But that's how most of the socialist countries work, those who work are higly taxed and those who don't work get the taxpayers money.

Socialist have a flawed way of thinking, it's not working people who are most important, but consumers. Becouse workers are just a part of society, but everyone is a consumer, which is why free market capitalism works so good.
Reply
:iconparty9999999:
Party9999999 Featured By Owner May 4, 2017
No, that's not how it worked, indeed a few socialist country when so far as end taxation.
Reply
:iconvladiverse:
Vladiverse Featured By Owner May 4, 2017  Hobbyist Digital Artist
If You really are Marxist then You are for the wealth distribution which means everybody works, gives all fruits of Their labor, and someone splits Them in the way everybody have equal amount. For someone who have at least a slightest idea about the economy that's 100% tax for everyone and living on what state gives. You can't have a state without taxes.
Reply
:iconthatgrumpywriter:
ThatGrumpyWriter Featured By Owner Jan 29, 2017
I'm pretty sure part of socialism is taking away your hard earned wealth and redistributing it, no?
Reply
:iconmarcioo9:
marcioo9 Featured By Owner Mar 24, 2016  Hobbyist Artist
heh what a irony
Reply
:iconlostcameltoes:
lostcameltoes Featured By Owner Mar 4, 2016  Student General Artist
I think all government is corrupt some way.
Reply
:iconmajesticbandicoot:
MajesticBandicoot Featured By Owner Jan 20, 2017  Hobbyist General Artist
very true
Reply
:iconoddgarfield:
OddGarfield Featured By Owner Feb 17, 2016  Student
No, I'm thinking about Socialism sense Socialism would not exist without the taxes of the working class paying its existence through whole those on those social programs get free crap.
Reply
:icongrisador:
grisador Featured By Owner Nov 12, 2015
True
Reply
:iconredflag450:
RedFlag450 Featured By Owner Oct 12, 2015
But that's not tru capitalism! That's muh evil corpatism!
Reply
:iconmxm777:
mxm777 Featured By Owner Jun 28, 2015  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
right
Reply
:iconhk-0391:
HK-0391 Featured By Owner Jan 16, 2015   Digital Artist
Everyone reading this comment, get up, go and get some popcorn, and scroll down to watch the shit-storm unfold.
Reply
:iconlostcameltoes:
lostcameltoes Featured By Owner Mar 4, 2016  Student General Artist
Same omg XD
Reply
:iconhk-0391:
HK-0391 Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2015   Digital Artist
Thank you, past me! I needed a pick-me-up today.
Reply
:iconhk-0391:
HK-0391 Featured By Owner Apr 8, 2015   Digital Artist
No problem, future me!
Reply
:iconoriginalczechball:
originalCzechball Featured By Owner Jan 10, 2015
Communist elite stole money from working class and lives in luxury, remember Nicolae Ceaușescu?
Reply
:iconsoulessone12:
soulessone12 Featured By Owner Nov 27, 2014
shoot is the guy in the bottom center going to drink all that?
Reply
:iconparty9999999:
Party9999999 Featured By Owner Nov 30, 2014
Swim in it more like.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Sep 10, 2014  Hobbyist
Someone earned that money. If not them then their fathers, or their grand fathers. Point is somewhere down the line someone worked their ass of to become rich. THATS Capitalism. Those with vision and drive end up at the top. Those that simply want to clock in and clock out everyday don't.
Reply
:iconcochegara:
Cochegara Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2014
Most of rich bastards of XIX century just stolen money from state budget.
Most of rich bastards of XXI century just recieved same money in form of subsidies.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 1, 2014  Hobbyist
They received those because they built successful companies that our economy needs in order to function.
Reply
:iconmoxc:
MOxC Featured By Owner Feb 23, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
A successful company that is integral to the economy should not need subsidies or bailouts. 
Reply
:iconcochegara:
Cochegara Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2014
And they are still repeat this "we are hardworkers" bullshit.
This cowards just can't face the truth.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 3, 2014  Hobbyist
You have no idea how economy s work do you? 
Reply
:iconcochegara:
Cochegara Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2014
It works like this: we produce, you consume.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2014  Hobbyist
I produce as well the rise I would have no money with which to consume.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2014  Hobbyist
I produce as well though. Otherwise j would have no money with which to consume. 
Reply
:iconcochegara:
Cochegara Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2014
White-collar? Produces?
:D
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconjarreltheluckyone:
Jarreltheluckyone Featured By Owner Jun 14, 2014
"I don't like socialists (politicians of socialist party?) Because they are not socialists." C. Degaulle.
Reply
:iconludoms:
ludoms Featured By Owner Jul 30, 2014
"capitalism is the exploitation of men by men, syndicalism is the inverse" M.Colucci (AKA Coluche)
Reply
:iconjarreltheluckyone:
Jarreltheluckyone Featured By Owner Jul 31, 2014
He was so right! pffff! If he see the world of today.... :-/
Reply
:iconborchenstein:
Borchenstein Featured By Owner May 25, 2014
very true
Reply
:iconopinionsprofile:
OpinionsProfile Featured By Owner May 13, 2014
That's pretty much exactly what it is.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner May 12, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
The free market is about free trade and the creation of wealth. Socialism always fails after they run out of other people's money to steal.
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Jul 17, 2015
Capitalism always fails when it runs out of other peoples' money.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner Jul 17, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Except in a free market system, people are free to generate their own wealth. You're free to invest freely and then, if the venture is successful, you turn a profit. It's not like Socialism where people who work too hard or not hard enough are arrested by the secret police for attempting to undermine the party, thereby scaring people out of doing anything that might make them stand out, like inventing things.
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Jul 17, 2015
No, in a free market system you are free to rob people of the full value of their labour. It's not generating you're own wealth if the entire basis is making other people work, and not paying them the full value of what they do. That's called using other peoples' money.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner Jul 17, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Your thinking of socialism. In that system, all your labor belongs to the state and when they take it, you're lucky if they don't send you to the goulag for not thanking them enough.

System based on making other people work? Is there such a thing as a system that doesn't have other people doing work. I know the meat cutters at the deli can't do crap unless drivers deliver the meat.

And you know they're not being paid the value of their labor... because you were properly indoctrinated? The whole point of the free market is supply meeting demand. Workers want to be paid as much as possible while employers want to pay as little as possible, and they meet somewhere in the middle and all have maximum satisfaction. Or we could just pay menial workers $1000 an hour and then the business goes under. 
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2015
Apart from the obvious flaws with that statement, no I'm definitely thinking of Capitalism. Capitalism is wear someone exploits you, and if you don't get exploited you either are an exploiter, or you starve to death. 

Right, so you said something completely different to what I said. What you pointed out is called "team work". What I was pointing out was "someone else making money of someone else's work". EG, I make 10 guys produce PC's and make another guy sell them. The profits go to me, and I pay the people working. I am doing nothing, and getting much more money than the other 11 guys. I am making other people generate my wealth. 

Because if they were being paid the full value of their labour then the employer wouldn't be making a profit, and the actual working people would be a lot richer than the business owners. And I really don't see your point, the real menial workers (CEO's and such, who sit around doing effectively nothing) get paid much more than a grand an hour.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
The free market is people trading without the state pointing a gun at them telling them what to do. That right there is exploitation. But maybe there's a world beyond master and slave. Maybe it's possible for people to agree to work together out of a sense of mutual need? Nah. That'd be silly.

So basically you believe that work can exist without a hierarchy? Apparently the Soviets disagreed with you because Stalin was on top of pretty much everything and murdered everyone he didn't like. His crimes against humanity would have made Hitler blush if he'd lived long enough to see them.

And the profit goes back into the business so it can expand, hire more workers, produce more product, thereby making an even greater profit to pay even more workers and thus the standard of living is raised as more and more people are employed. That's how it's worked for Africa with fewer and fewer people each year living off less than a dollar a day. Gradual improvement. As opposed to just stealing from the rich, distributing it amongst the poor, minus the fee taken by those in power. It works really great for one year, but after that there's nothing left to redistribute so the state just focuses on lowering the standard of living.

Tell me. If you system is so much better, why doesn't it exist? It's been tried numerous times, but it always fails some time after the death camps are built. And why the compulsion to murder countless men, women, and children anyway? Not cool www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjY4jQ…

Also, why are you arguing with me on this? I've seen evidence that socialism fails. Besides the human rights violations, there's also this little thing called the tragedy of commons. Then there's the warping of culture to make everyone distrust each other so that no one will think of teaming up against the tyranny of the state. I've seen the evidence. You saying that CEOs make more money than me isn't going to win me over to your cause.
Reply
:iconvakai:
Vakai Featured By Owner Dec 9, 2015
Ok, it's pretty obvious you have no idea of what the basics of socialism is. Your idea that it is a system in which the government takes working people's money and gives it to those who don't work, or whatever is completely ridiculous. Geuss what? I myself am a socialist, and I don't fucking want that. I don't want the government taking away someone's money that they worked for and give it all to me. Ask any actual socialist, and they will tell you that this isn't what we want. What we do want is a society where the working class is in control of the means of production, as opposed to capitalism where the capitalist class owns the means of production and hires workers to operate them. Why should all the wealth I create from my labor go to some guy who does nothing but owns the business. Also, the whole idea that if you want to become rich under capitalism is just work hard, is completely ludicrous. If that were the case, then the 99% would own the majority of the wealth, as opposed to the 1% owning it. However that is not the case. And if capitalism is such a great system, then why are there millions of Americans, who are homeless, without jobs, and who live in poverty? BTW, did you know that in socialist countries it is proven fact that the unemployment rate was lower than in capitalst countries? Seriously though, learn about socialism from actual credible sources, and not from some right wing politicians who will always tell you it's bad just to keep your vote. Visit some socialist party websites, talk to some socialists or whatever. All I'm trying to say is if you want to debate over socialism, then at least know what the ideology actually means first.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconnonestar:
NoneStar Featured By Owner May 24, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Yay a smart person.
Reply
:iconlordmep:
lordmep Featured By Owner May 24, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
Nope. Just a guy quoting other smart people.
Reply
:iconnonestar:
NoneStar Featured By Owner May 24, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Well you have to be smart to quote someone smart, else you would quote someone that wasn't. :P
Reply
:icongeminisaga5:
geminisaga5 Featured By Owner Jun 30, 2014  Student
Hope you know that Einstein disagree's with that.
Reply
:icondaneofscandinavy:
DaneOfScandinavy Featured By Owner May 12, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Well, people living off of welfare aren't working hard....
Reply
:icondaisrunbybigots:
DAisrunbybigots Featured By Owner May 12, 2014
Reply
:iconninjawerr:
ninjawerr Featured By Owner May 10, 2014  Professional Writer
And your thinking corperationisum, not capitalism. 
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
September 27, 2013
Image Size
928 KB
Resolution
744×990
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
11,612 (1 today)
Favourites
170 (who?)
Comments
116
Downloads
45
×