Most of rich bastards of XXI century just recieved same money in form of subsidies.
This cowards just can't face the truth.
One of MammaObama's vacations would feed a poor food stamp recipient for better than 1500 years. And they take a lot of vacations.
Obama cost 1.5 billion in upkeep in 2012, about an 8oth of the annual food stamp cost. Add the cost of all the other oinking politicians and food stamps and feeding the poor to stop them from robbing you is cheaper than feeding the politicians to stop them from robbing you.
And the poor rob you less often.
the same can be said for both, (capitalisum and comunisum) however the rich don't stay rich in capitalisum unless they are fair and just to there employies, and that includes helping them generate weath as well. in socalisum its work to make me rich or die.
what does that do to your argument?
Don't beleve me? read a history book on the two topics then agure your point.
Socialism have a lot of problems too, that's far from being a secret.
But in my country (France), we never enjoyed classical capitalism. After the fall of the monarchy, there was a direct switch to financial capitalism (because most of the philosophers of the enlightenment promoted it, especially Voltaire). This is why I didn't thought about classical capitalism at first. This is also why I wouldn't say no to more informations on the subject.
we enjoyed it briefly over here in my country (America) Following the new deal, the real end to it was fine print in the act that created the EPA.
Goes to show you we need to create guidelines for our laws or they shouldn't become laws.