Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
Vote Jill Stein by Party9999999 Vote Jill Stein by Party9999999
Last minute I know. But Stein is the only candidate I feel I can support.
Add a Comment:
 
:icondesperado615:
desperado615 Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2017
Didn't she get less then 2% of the vote?  Wow what an effort.
Reply
:iconlordelthibar:
LordElthibar Featured By Owner Dec 9, 2016
Yeah, you know she ended up backing Clinton in the recount and Hillary Clinton was behind the recount?
Reply
:iconmobile707:
mobile707 Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2016
She cleared about 1.2-1.3 million votes. Not bad.
Reply
:iconredstarrynight:
RedStarryNight Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2016
Not even close.
Reply
:iconsayis5:
Sayis5 Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2016
It's really not the point mate. Democracy under Capitalism is dogshit. But it's better to vote for something you want and not get it, than vote for something you don't want and get it.
Reply
:iconreddiamond28:
RedDiamond28 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
My school had a fake election- I was one of 7 or 8 who voted for Jill
Reply
:iconironpiedmont1996:
IronPiedmont1996 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
Hey, she ain't Hillary, so I can respect that. I actually prefer Stein over Hillary (other than Trump anyway).

Speaking of which I voted today. This is now officially the first United States Presidential Election I have ever voted in.
Reply
:iconmoxc:
MOxC Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Isn't she an anti-vaxxer? 
Reply
:iconsayis5:
Sayis5 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
No, she isn't. www.snopes.com/is-green-party-… Her comment was to be mindful of vaccines that are mandated and made-for-profit by corporations.
Reply
:iconmoxc:
MOxC Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2016  Hobbyist General Artist
Oh, fair enough. :)
Reply
:iconmariscalrudolf:
MariscalRudolf Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
That's literally the most liberal thing I've ever seeing you saying, party.
Reply
:iconunclestalin1945:
UncleStalin1945 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
What else is he supposed to say? "Go out, arm yourself, and revolt and immediately get put down by the cops?"
Reply
:iconmariscalrudolf:
MariscalRudolf Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
Lol, as if revolution was a spontaneous process...
But yes, preparing revolution would do a lot better than relying on "the less worse", like everything only depended on whoever becomes the president.
Reply
:iconunclestalin1945:
UncleStalin1945 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
Ha. Good luck organizing a left-wing revolution in America. Any efforts to do so would get shut down by the FBI and CIA before it could even develop into perceived threat in the first place. Not to mention about 95% of American gun-owners are right wingers who would rather side with the government they profess to hate than with a bunch of sniveling left-wing Communist "revolutionaries". Proletarian revolution, especially in the 1st world, is a meme than needs to end.
Reply
:iconmariscalrudolf:
MariscalRudolf Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
To be honest, I fully agreed with this.
Reply
:iconzeonista:
Zeonista Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
Go down swinging, man! CURSE YOU! 
Reply
:icontiltschmaster:
TiltschMaster Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
I feel like the whole notion of the "lesser evil" is one of a liberal mindset. If you realy bought into this whole notion of Trump being the next Hitler and the fear that if he would become President death squads would roam the streets, then you should also take decicive action, arm yourself and revolt. Instead people use this rethoric but then turn around and advocate voting for a "lesser" (if not equaly) evil candidate to prevent that scenario. 

Am I the only one who sees a gigantic dissonance here? 
Reply
:iconsayis5:
Sayis5 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
Then vote for La Riva.
Reply
:icontiltschmaster:
TiltschMaster Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
That would actualy be a viable option, yes. 
Reply
:iconunclestalin1945:
notgoingtohappen.png

American left-wingers are massive faggots, they'll never 'arm themselves and revolt' like you say they should since the majority of them get triggered by the very concept of private firearm ownership in the first place. The amount of pro-gun revolutionary leftists in America who would even consider revolt is so little that they are an entirely irrelevant minority that would get put down by cops in a matter of hours. Besides most 21st century first-world Communists are literal neckbeards who should be worrying more about their dangerously-high cholesterol than Capitalist oppression.
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2016
There is a "Socialist Rifle Association" to counter the NRA, but yeah 90% of the US "Left" are just fucking Liberal pussied.
Reply
:icontiltschmaster:
TiltschMaster Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
Yes, you are completly right on that. Still, one can hope and dream :D 
Reply
:iconfalkyno:
falkyno Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Professional Digital Artist
i love the "arm yourself and revolt people "lol
as if civilians  can beat the American military
need i say Vietnam
Afghanistan
Iraq
drone strikes
tanks
oh wait us citizens can use our semi automatics to take down government drones!
Reply
:icontiltschmaster:
TiltschMaster Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
You mean all the wars the United States lost in the end despite their superior military force? In Vietnam, the greatest military on earth got beat by a guerillia force armed with WWII rifles camping in the forest. In Afghanistan there has not been a government or military controlling all of the country til this day. The government and regular army of Iraq got stomped, yes, but the tribal insurrection and non-state-actors have destabilized Iraq so far that the state of Iraq doesn't even exist anymore. Drone strikes are actualy very limited in what they can do and drones literaly are hardware you can build yourself with stuff you can buy at Wallmart. Which is exactly what the rebels and the militas in Ukraine are doing right now with great effectiveness. Tanks are of very limited use in city combat and several governments armed with huge ammounts of tanks got still beat by guerillia forces, like in Vietnam, in Syria or in Ukraine. 

Also: A government fighting it's own population has to destroy it's own economy. Look at Syria. Do you think that government will sit firmly in the saddle even IF they can manage to defeat the rebels inside their own country? And they can only win because of Russian intervention, despite their superior military arsenal and airpower. And if you think Russia or China will give the US government any aid in the case of a hypothetical American Civil War, you are a special kind of stupid. 
Reply
:iconfalkyno:
falkyno Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Professional Digital Artist
regardless your guns wont save you from them like that
Reply
:icontiltschmaster:
TiltschMaster Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2016
I don't live in the US, so I don't realy give a fuck. They have bigger problems as of tomorrow :D 
Reply
:iconamericanknight1234:
AMERICANKNIGHT1234 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Student Artist
We got our asses kicked in Vietnam, Afghanistan, and in Iraq plus are they gonna bomb their own cities that would cause even more revolts a revolution would be quick it would only last a few months a few hundred million armed civvies with semi auto rifles and Artillery vs at least a few thousand troops remember most of the U.S military is loyal to the public and so i think at least one and half million would defect to the rebels. Also semi auto's where used mostly in Korea WW2 and WW1 those are the wars we won the most, the semi auto rifle doesn't jam as often as an automatic would they have less recoil more stoping power and they are everywhere also a semi auto AR could be converted to a full auto easily.
A tank could easily be made by rebels to outnumber the Abrams MBT's it would be like how the German military were outnumbered easily by the Soviets. Drones can be taken out easily most flak cannons can get rid of them quickly, along with AMR users if a sharpshooter is quick enough and can calculate the trajectory of their bullets and they can hit the senors, Cameras , and prop on the back.

Three hundred million armed civilians with semi auto rifles vs two million U.S troops yeah that would be the quickest fight ever numbers matter more if you think about it.
Reply
:iconfalkyno:
falkyno Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Professional Digital Artist
lol, drone strike, missle, missle, nuke<,>,<,>, A+B times have changed
Reply
:iconamericanknight1234:
AMERICANKNIGHT1234 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Student Artist
Nuking your own cities is stupid don't you think if they nuked lets say Manhattan then the'd lose. Airstriking a neighborhood would mean riots would break out across the nation. Only a dumbass would destroy their own city in order to stop a few rebels. They would be destroying their incomr their weapons factories their ports their food supply their pipelines. Like i said we'd win.
Reply
:iconfalkyno:
falkyno Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Professional Digital Artist
if youre talking an allout war with your government where youd be willing to fire on soldiers and authorities then yes boom shaka laka
Reply
:iconamericanknight1234:
AMERICANKNIGHT1234 Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Student Artist
Eh i'd think that half the soldiers would join us in all honesty. Most us soldiers hate the Government.
Reply
:iconfalkyno:
falkyno Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Professional Digital Artist
this is one reason the mechanized combat robots we're making is scary, it would render us useless in a fight against a totalitarian regime
Reply
(1 Reply)
:iconclawfiren:
Clawfiren Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016   General Artist
Is Vietnam a good example?
Reply
:icontiltschmaster:
TiltschMaster Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
No, it is not. A superior military force got kicked their asses by people armed with WWII rifles camping in the forest. 
Reply
:iconclawfiren:
Clawfiren Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2016   General Artist
:XD:
Reply
:iconchorniymedved:
Chorniymedved Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
don't forget korea, they got their asses beat their too
Reply
:iconkyriakos-cyp:
Kyriakos-Cyp Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
She seems like not only the least bad option but perhaps a good one?
Reply
:iconder-himmelstern:
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
If you wish for another government of liars,
vote (((Jill Stein))).
Reply
:iconadmiralmichalis:
It's better than Drumpf or Killary.  The alternatives aren't really preferable.
Reply
:iconsootyjared:
sootyjared Featured By Owner Edited Nov 8, 2016
I'm sure your talking about donald trump...
Reply
:iconder-himmelstern:
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
We will see what value Trump has once he is president.
I will still keep a watchful eye on him. If he reveals himself
to be another prostitute of the system, I will judge him
accordingly.
Reply
:iconfalkyno:
falkyno Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016  Professional Digital Artist
casino owner who fed off of addicts
"IF" he reveals himself
to be another prostitute of the system


IF
 

lol that boats has sailed a looooong time ago
Reply
:iconsootyjared:
sootyjared Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
You have to remember that he is already prostitute of the system, if he becomes president he will be the pimp and Americans will be his bitchs.
Reply
:iconder-himmelstern:
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
So Hillary Clinton, the ultimate pawn of the system or Communist
Berni Sanders or (((Jill Stein))) are better? He is clearly the least
lethal poison of them all. He is the living incarnation of what the
American dream is supposed to be.
Reply
:iconsootyjared:
sootyjared Featured By Owner Nov 8, 2016
Yes, you have to remember that Hillary Clinton has had a history in politics, trump has had a history in reality tv and business. If you asked who Hillary Clinton was in 2014 i would have that she was a politician who is related to Bill Clinton, if you asked me who Donald trump is i would have replied "isn't he the guy from the american version of the apprentice?". The man is an outsider to politics who hasn't had any basic experience in politics, his ego is too big and his solutions to Americas problems are only going to make more problems. You can protest Hillary after the vote, you can't protest trump if he wins - freedom of speech is at serious risk in a trump's america. 
Reply
:iconder-himmelstern:
Der-Himmelstern Featured By Owner Nov 10, 2016
Hillary Clinton does have a history in politics, and a
disastrous one. Even an actor could do better than
her.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
November 8, 2016
Image Size
738 KB
Resolution
686×915
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
443
Favourites
19 (who?)
Comments
47
Downloads
3
×