Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
×




Details

Submitted on
September 30, 2013
Image Size
1.6 MB
Resolution
763×935
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
5,747 (6 today)
Favourites
131 (who?)
Comments
433
Downloads
42
×
The Evils of Communism by Party9999999 The Evils of Communism by Party9999999
Add a Comment:
 
:iconicedude1994:
icedude1994 Featured By Owner Jan 11, 2015
Now Capitalist PigHoles let me ask you all HOW IS THIS EVIL!!???
Reply
:iconfesmiro1:
FESMiro1 Featured By Owner 6 days ago  Hobbyist General Artist
Because...

1. They don't want to pay taxes.

2. They are greedy assholes.

3. They are secretly racist and sexist.

4. They don't care about society.

It's fun to list how dumb the upper cass is :D
Reply
:iconicedude1994:
icedude1994 Featured By Owner Edited 4 days ago
ooh yeah??

1. Taxes aren't good for shit

2. and your Corrupt masters aren't not??

3. Slander and bribed accusation lies

4. you got that reversed

Upper cass?? it's Class You Yokel Capitalism is Death Socialism is Liberation!!!!!!!!!
Reply
:iconfesmiro1:
FESMiro1 Featured By Owner 4 days ago  Hobbyist General Artist
1. Taxes are used to get us benefits, for example health care and social services.

2. Corrupted masters? Herein Finland? Da fug do you mean!?

3. A radical example, I admit. Not all rich people are. But if you are rich and powerful, you can get away with almost everything, even with racist or sexist comments.

4. A working society needs everyone in it to help and support each other. People who avoid the payment of taxes are keeping part of the nations wealth, that could be used to provide free schooling, health care,  public transport, social services etc.

Oh sorry for one small incorrect word, mein grammar Führer
Reply
:iconicedude1994:
icedude1994 Featured By Owner 2 days ago
1. Also enforced by thugs and cast people in to Prison amoung the worst kind of criminals and Taxes never decrease they INCREASE

2. Even Finland has a black sheep amoung it's herd remember every herd always has a black sheep amoung them

3. not if they are taken down by a rogue faction

4. And why aren't those services Free?? Because of chains of taxes and regulations made to slow and deviate and stupify the common folk from the upper class

Capitalism is Not the answer to everything only money is gained and with money comes greed and greed breeds corruption your Capitalistic logic is Invalid
Reply
:iconfesmiro1:
FESMiro1 Featured By Owner 2 days ago  Hobbyist General Artist
I do not support capitalism, I support other types of market-economy, like democratic socialism. 
Reply
:iconicedude1994:
icedude1994 Featured By Owner 1 day ago
"democratic"??? sorry do you mean "Corrupted Capitalist Agenda"??? "socialism"....did you mean "The only way to rule the world right"????
Reply
:iconfesmiro1:
FESMiro1 Featured By Owner 1 day ago  Hobbyist General Artist

Democratic socialism is a political ideology advocating a democratic political system alongside a socialist economic system. This may refer to extending principles of democracy in the economy (such as through cooperatives or workplace democracy), or may simply refer to trends of socialism that emphasise democratic principles as inalienable from their political project.

There is no exact definition of democratic socialism. Some forms of democratic socialism overlap with social democracy, while other forms reject social democratic reformism in favor of more revolutionary methods, and overlap with Revolutionary Socialism.

Some definitions simply refer to all forms of socialism that follow a gradual, reformist or evolutionary path to socialism, rather than a revolutionary one.[1] Often, this definition is invoked to distinguish democratic socialism from Stalinist socialism, as in Donald Busky's Democratic Socialism: A Global Survey,[2] Jim Tomlinson's Democratic Socialism and Economic Policy: The Attlee Years, 1945-1951, Norman Thomas Democratic Socialism: a new appraisal or Roy Hattersley's Choose Freedom: The Future of Democratic Socialism.

Reply
:iconicedude1994:
icedude1994 Featured By Owner 1 day ago
"democratic"??? sorry do you mean "Corrupted Capitalist Agenda"??? "socialism"....did you mean "The only way to rule the world right"????
Reply
:iconalcyonesong:
AlcyoneSong Featured By Owner Jan 5, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
that's cool and stuff but who is going to pay for it?
Reply
:iconpaphilly:
PAPhilly Featured By Owner Dec 19, 2014
1. Free healthcare doesn't work and isn't practical. Just look at Canada, with actually HIGHER costs and long lines for simple medications: news.heartland.org/newspaper-a…
2. Public schools don't work either. One only has to read any new article from Philly to understand that; our schools have been floundering for YEARS but keep squealing for more money when we're already dumping it at them. Just look at this pie chart and tell me with a straight face that's not enough.  www.pahousegop.com/Display/Sit…
3. I concede that racism and sexism are issues, but they're nowhere near as prevalent as they used to be. It's also worth noting that racism and sexism are at least somewhat genetically hardwired into us. I'll have to dig up the source for that, if anyone asks.
4. See, the issue with making everyone equal is that you have to cater to the lowest common denominator. If everyone was truly equal, EVERYONE WOULD BE A DUMBASS!!! Read a good little short story on that once; the government used chips to inhibit people's intelligence so they'd all be on the same, dumber than a kindergartener footing.
Reply
:iconmrmephobia:
MrMephobia Featured By Owner Jan 2, 2015
Hello fellow Reactionary. And remember: equality is a false God.
Reply
:iconbriannabater:
Briannabater Featured By Owner Dec 6, 2014  Professional Photographer
Awesome :)
Reply
:iconicedude1994:
icedude1994 Featured By Owner Nov 20, 2014
Soviet Union was Socialist and Communist

U.S.A is Capitalist now let me show you how policies are in diffrent cities that believe in one of thise in catergories as in USA's Capitalism and the former USSR's beliefs Communism(Without tyrants intervining)

Location:South American Countries and United States of America, China's goverment also( China's political standing not taken into account)
Political standing: Capitalist (Communist rebellions exept for Cuba is complete communist)
Corruption: Massive & wide spread
Reason: Laws enforced by corrupted officials and un-controlled Drug cartels & Drug Warlords and Crime sydicates running rampant and free to do as they wish

Location: Canada and Most west-europian countries
Political standing: mostly Communist ideals (pretending to be Capitalist for Anti-communist USA)
Corruption: Very low and far in between
Reason: everybody gets Healthcare and Education support and nobody is hostile 

Surwey says: DO THE MATH!!!! COMMUNISM RULEZ!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
:iconlord-kiyo:
Lord-Kiyo Featured By Owner Edited Sep 16, 2014
I thought the world was big enough to have different policies in different places so people can find the place they would be happy at.  But apparently one policy wants to rule the whole world.

Communism as an idea is okay, actually in some of my books there are small societies that work in a form of it.  However when you apply it with a vast number of humans.  Let's just say people start to get tired of getting less than what they worked, and supporting the lazy. Not all jobs are the same.  And once you put a human in charge of something, it eventually falls apart.  Humans are naturally greedy.  The onse that were not greedy was massacred about 200 years ago.

But I prefer to be responsible for my own living, not someone else.  And I am on the low end of the totem poll when it comes to class.  But I have the opportunity to climb it.  With Communism, can you climb a ladder and improve your living? Or are you stuck on the same level, regardless how hard you work, for the sake of keeping people equal?
Reply
:iconthe-conquerors:
The-Conquerors Featured By Owner Sep 12, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
ITs not communism people have a problem with, its the dick heads they put in charge. That and how every communist government had devolved in a dictatorship and apparently "no true communism," has been achieved yet.
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Sep 10, 2014  Hobbyist
You forgot dictatorships, political imprisonment, police states, genocide, indoctrination, secret police, repression of social liberty, propaganda centered media, one party politics, a micro managing government, need I go on?
Reply
:iconcottage-cheese:
Cottage-cheese Featured By Owner Oct 6, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Haha,those ideas are based on socialism
Reply
:icondigiquilldraws:
DigiquillDraws Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2014  Hobbyist
Which was my point.
Reply
:icondeanthefoul:
DeantheFoul Featured By Owner Sep 9, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
100+ million deaths also included lel
Reply
:iconinfiniterespect:
InfiniteRespect Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Thats not Communism, fucktard
Reply
:icondeanthefoul:
DeantheFoul Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
>Criticizes actions of a political regime
>Is cussed out for it without argument
even more toplel.
Reply
:iconinfiniterespect:
InfiniteRespect Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
>Attempts to troll
>Mistakes socialism for Communism
>should do research lel
Reply
:icondeanthefoul:
DeantheFoul Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist

Nowhere have I stated that socialism is the same as Marxism or any of its implementations that are widely described as communism.
I myself could be described as 'economically left' as I do have a strong support for welfare.
I have researched enough about communism. And while I myself lack the empathy to disregard ideologies because of their death count. I simply disagree with communism.
But I do consider those deaths as important. They tell us something.
Lenin: 11 million
Stalin: 40 million
Mao: 60 million
And these are just examples. When reading about Mao, well, besides being a cruel wank I am convinced most of the deaths caused by him are just his stupid self trying to implement the ideology and failing terribly.
Lenin was probably just cruel, but perhaps had the same mind-set as for example the authoritarian leader Adolf Hitler. Both used camps as a punishment, Why Lenin's death toll greatly exceeds that Adolf's is probably because Russia is one hell of a big country. While strongly disregarding communism, I must say I don’t believe Lenin didn’t care about his people. He worked 16 hours a day, and his heart attack was speculated to be the cause of stress. So like I said, probably just because of authoritarian rule. Still to be taken seriously but it is a different thing.
Stalin... Stalin was a smart guy. But in no way did he care for his people. Where at some points Russian leaders forced entire populations of ethnicities out of their native land to repress Nationalism (which is still horrible), Stalin saw a rise of nationalism in the Ukraine and thought 'hey, why not take the easy way?' and killed 7,5 million Ukrainians through starvation which is known as the Holodomor. Further horrors of Stalin included aiding the Polish forces in purging ethnic-Germans that were forced to live there after the treaty of Versailles, having the secret police pick up random innocents so they could be executed on film (after they were forced to admit their fictional crimes, as to create a false image), and many many civilians targeted for deportation to gulags or execution because of their supposed 'threat' to the nation. Intellectuals, high ranking officers, people with important positions of power... because perhaps they would conspire to overthrow Stalin, yes?
Stalin had no regard for human decency and was a terrible man. Even Lenin sais this. In Lenin's last testament, he said that Stalin had to be removed from his position of power at all costs, for he had qualities that were 'unfit for a man in his positon'. Stalin and his followers made sure that Lenin's last testament would never be read aloud to the 13th Party Congress as was Lenin's will. Stalin was a smart man. He was able to govern. But, with such extreme inhumanity that everyone else who did not bow to his will completely (and even those completely innocent) paid the price.
These 3 caused deaths by implementing the ideology. Anti-nationalism, the enforcing of equality on all areas, and the abolishment property- people were a resource used and owned by the government. People weren’t people anymore.

I suggest that if you want to see the undeniable and peaceful success of communism, you should go live in North-Korea. I would definitely be willing to hear from you then, if they haven’t taken away international contact through internet to censor things...

Reply
:iconinfiniterespect:
InfiniteRespect Featured By Owner Oct 16, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Do you even realise that Stalin and Mao's ideologies were no-where near Communism? Stalin's USSR had MONEY, something that Communism shouldn't have. Same with Mao. As for Lenin, I'll admit, he did do some bad things. BUT, he did not kill 11 million people as you have said.I would like to see where you got that info from. He actually only killed what is speculated up to only 60,000-1,000,000.

And North Korea? They're not even Communist. In fact, their official name, The Democratic People's Republic of Korea, would suggest that they are right-wing (Which everyone knows they are not), yet they're Socialist. Plus, EQUALITY. Do you see that in NK? I think not
Reply
:iconb1g-cr1me:
B1G-CR1ME Featured By Owner Aug 26, 2014  Student Traditional Artist
Tea party is the word.
Reply
:iconmekarinkishi:
Mekarinkishi Featured By Owner Aug 25, 2014  Hobbyist General Artist
I personally think Communism itself is not the answer for a better "government" or administration of a country. 

It should be fused with other ideas or principles of other systems.

Communism has many flaws the way it is established now, or we could say it is used or managed the wrong way.

But a well thought and balanced one can do great things for a country, especially for those who work.

I live in a country where the poor has it all and the worker has less every day. 

The governement takes the money from the workers to give it to the "poor". Now, in my country, this is the definition of poor: Free house with all the space and rooms you desire, pools, light and water bills are cheaper, free food, new remodeling inside and outside house, new expensive celphones, nails, women have 4 kids or more and always have time for beauty salons. What do they do to deserve all this? Nothing. :3 Just chillax at their homes while the workers wake up at 4am, leave their families and go sweat their butts off to at least support the "poor", themselves and the family.

Rich people in my country...they are in their own world. They care less for the poor and the worker, just making money.

What I suggest? The poor should stay poor unless they work to get out of the hole they are in. Sounds cruel but I think its best. Treat society a bit with harshness can teach them a lesson that to get the things you want and "deserve" you should study and/or work for it. Nothing should come easy as 1,2,3 to your hands without moving a finger and making kids all day.

Another problem with my country is that "poor" women give birth to many children. I see this so wrong. Most do it for sex or accidents in affairs. They have "necesities". They can't afford to have more kids. Aaaaah, but in y country, the more kids you have the more money they give you, PER CHILD. :'3 Isnt it great?

Sometimes I wonder who truly is poor in my country. The lazy or the worker. :/

Of course, politicians dont move a finger. They offer all these benefits to the "poor". The MAJORITY in my country are "poor" or enjoy the "Wellfare" shit. What democracy is this shit? NO DEMOCRACY! WHY SHOULD ALL THE WEIGHT FALL ON THE WORKER?

Anyways, I want a true leader, not a politician as the administrator of my country.


God bless you all.
Reply
:iconlord-kiyo:
Lord-Kiyo Featured By Owner Sep 16, 2014
Thats starting to happen here in the USA, not as bad as you describe, but getting close.  But what will happen when the amount of work being done can no longer support the amount of lazy people there are because the lazy population eventually gets up to 80%?
Reply
:iconallman08:
allman08 Featured By Owner Sep 7, 2014
I have read your statement and i must say i am impressed. I agree that communism should be fused with other principles of other systems. I myself am trying to Mix communism with a little bit capitalism or other forms of socialism. But i'm 17 and i have to focus more on my studies right now.

But i don't agree with what you say about the weight of a country should fall on the shoulder of the government. I can understand what you mean. You Don't force a man to work until he drops dead. But i don't elect a man or a woman to be the first minister and expect him/her to do my work for me. Its like, putting the entire weight of your country, job and family on their shoulders and the complain that they are doing a bad job (though they do  have priorities they should focus on and stop spending money on stupid stuff). We all have our part in holding up our country.

 Now back to the politics. I feel communism is more of a way to help your country during the time of need. Like during war or a depression. People will get what they need to survive, and the government will get the money the need to rebuild the country(if the aren't greedy and try to spend all the money on stupid stuff). But you do give some good points.

I give you my respect.
May God watch over you.
Reply
:icontruegrimreaper64:
TrueGrimReaper64 Featured By Owner Edited Aug 21, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
(Not shown) 
* Backwards culture
* Slow technological development
* Isolation from the world
* Shoddy good quality
* Low standard of living

The Dangers of Democratic Capitalism:
* A say in the government
* Private, personal Ownership
* Quick Technological development
* Cultural Exchange

(Not shown)
* Unequal wealth distribution
* Exploitative Businessmen
* Being exposed to ideas you disagree with everyday
* Abuse of different peoples and minorities
* Being responsible for your own living
Reply
:iconinfiniterespect:
InfiniteRespect Featured By Owner Aug 3, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
WTF

THE THINGS LISTED HERE ARE GOOD! WHY WOULD ANYONE WANT TO PREVENT THEM?!
Reply
:iconinfiniterespect:
InfiniteRespect Featured By Owner Aug 4, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Oh
Reply
:iconsovietredstar:
SovietRedStar Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2014  Student Digital Artist
It Would Work , If Stalin And His Face Cattepilar Didnt Live
Reply
:iconinfiniterespect:
InfiniteRespect Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Exactly 
Reply
:iconbonecrusher56:
bonecrusher56 Featured By Owner Aug 2, 2014
Don't get me wrong. I completely agree with communism in these sense's.but unfortunately communism believes in all power goes to government. And stalin, castro, and mou have proven what happens when that occurs.of course if somthing is possible then it still might work.of course we could always meet in a middle ground
Reply
:iconchampion137:
Champion137 Featured By Owner Jul 23, 2014
Communism never worked before. Why should you think it'll work now?

There's only one true communist country left, and I doubt it will remain so forever.
Reply
:iconsoulessone12:
soulessone12 Featured By Owner Jul 20, 2014
While communism has some good ideas we must remember just because it looks good on paper doesn't mean you can get the same results from practice heck Lenin who was in my opinion the closest to achieving Marx's dream had to backtrack a bit (he had to go a little capitalistic in order that for the USSR economy to be in good shape) so this might look sweet and happy it really didn't do well in the long run
Reply
:iconinfraredphoenix:
InfraredPhoenix Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2014  Student General Artist
Laughs. 
This is funny.
Reply
:iconvladamerevolkov:
VladamereVolkov Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2014  Hobbyist Digital Artist
GREAT! I love this for the way it portrays the bourgeoisie as tea drinking oppressors.
Reply
:iconxylophon:
Xylophon Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2014  Student Digital Artist
Let's play a game! Read through this comment section and take a shot for every criticism of communism that applies equally or even more so to capitalism! Readysetgo!

*five minutes later*

If you need me *hic* I'll be in *hic* my...room...*passes out*
Reply
:iconabraxaes:
abraxaes Featured By Owner Jul 31, 2014
Alternatively lets read how every communist regime has been a failiure :)

Not sure if your trolling?
Reply
:iconmynameisn:
MyNameIsN Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2014
That's only if you confuse Capitalism with Corporatism.  Corporatism is the economic system of America right now, and it is anything but a free market.
Reply
:iconxylophon:
Xylophon Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2014  Student Digital Artist
If the economic system of the United States, of all places, isn't real capitalism, I'd be afraid to see what is.
Reply
:iconmivpus:
mivpus Featured By Owner Jun 29, 2014
It would be hilarious as all Hel if this was the Tea Party's own poster XD
Reply
:iconhmsnike:
hmsnike Featured By Owner Jun 24, 2014
In theory.

Unfortunately, like a lot of things that work well on paper, it doesn't work as well in practice because of two things:

1) Human beings are mostly selfish dicks who will go out of their way to have MORE.

2) It takes a much bigger welfare budget than just about any society can sustain.

Now, granted; if you manage to create an economic situation where you CAN sustain that kind of welfare budget without breaking the bank or running your economy into the dirt, then by all means, go for it. But if you don't, it's just going to collapse on itself.
Reply
:iconfabulousemma:
FabulousEmma Featured By Owner Jun 23, 2014  Student General Artist
Of course! Killing innocent people is awesome! *sarcasm*
Reply
:iconguppy22143:
guppy22143 Featured By Owner Jun 23, 2014
Communism, while it's goals are admirable, is a flawed concept with a sullied reputation.

To achieve communist utopia, we must first pass through socialism. For the USSR, btw, socialism meant state capitalist.
But, socialism only succeeds by producing a large enough quantity of supplies for a set amount of people right when those people need it.

Hence why people in the USSR starved. Communism only succeeds if we can predict the future.
Reply
:iconsonofchinglu:
SonofChinglu Featured By Owner Jun 11, 2014
Universal Health Care*
Free Public Education**
Combating of Racism and Sexism***
Society where all are equal****

*May not apply if you live outside a major city. If you are not a high ranking party member, your health care facility may or may not be stocked with medicines or working equipment, and doctors may or may not have passed an exam.

** With a large helping of indoctrination. Because God doesn't exist, all good things come from the party, there is no greater achievement than working long hours for the state for low pay, and anyone who doubts this is an enemy of the state.

*** Unless you're non Russian. Tatars, Kazakhs, Uzbeks, Tajiks, Turkomans, and the various natives of Siberia should be happy that they're allowed to hold jobs in the bottom ranks of the party and military.

**** Except for party officials, who get all manner of luxuries not available to the common worker, and dissidents and their friends, reletives, and co-workers, who will be closely watched by the state security apparatus, denied promotions, travel permits, and many government services.
Reply
:iconhmsnike:
hmsnike Featured By Owner Jun 24, 2014
To be fair, none of those asterisk points are actually part of the communist ideal. My problem with the notion is that just about every economy in the world wouldn't be able to sustain all those grand promises for their entire population. Which leads to the same kind of inequalities that this kind of thing is supposed to be doing away with.

It sounds good on paper in it's pure ideal, but in practice it just falls apart on itself.
Reply
Add a Comment: