Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
The Evils of Communism by Party9999999 The Evils of Communism by Party9999999
Add a Comment:
 
:iconduffman10:
duffman10 Featured By Owner Feb 3, 2016
Darth Trump as president= No more free speech, No more Gay Marriage, No more Net neutrality, no more Mexicans or Muslims allowed in the country, complete misuse on the  constitution and every other bill, no more atheism or science of any kind, no other religion than Christianity, police state establishment. I mean, how fucking stupid are people to vote for this maniac!? It's 1984 just as George Orwell predicted! If he gets elected, and he tries this shit, we must fight for our rights.
I'ts scary how much power he will have. That is if he's elected.
Reply
:icontheagentofvenom:
theagentofvenom Featured By Owner Feb 1, 2016
And I still wonder of how capitalism is a better system? Perhaps only for the wealthy.
Reply
:icondrforrester87:
DrForrester87 Featured By Owner Nov 17, 2015  Student General Artist
And free breadlines, free media censorship, free forced labor, free famine, free unviserally lower standards of living, free state police raids, free conscription, free enforced personal censorship
Reply
:iconsquidwardfan101:
squidwardfan101 Featured By Owner Dec 16, 2015
No, Genocide, Holodomor, FREE UKRAINE
Russia 1930's=England 1846-1850!
Reply
:iconsparkleaj:
SparkleAJ Featured By Owner Nov 24, 2015
Oh, boy! Where do I sign up?!
Reply
:iconshadono:
shadono Featured By Owner Nov 9, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Mass murder on a scale unparallelled in human history (excepting Adolf Hitler, another collectivist). Gulags.
Complete destruction of human freedom.
Poverty.
Walls and guards to keep people escaping from "paradise". How many fled capitalist states to live in the worker's Utopias, rather than the other way round?
Communists themselves eventually murdered by their own vile system - see fate of the Bolsheviks in the USSR, Trotsky etc.
Reply
:iconpatrioticparot:
PatrioticParot Featured By Owner Jan 11, 2016
Don't put that bullshit out. Capitalism has killed at least 1.2 Billion people.
maoistrebelnews.com/2010/12/30…
Reply
:iconshadono:
shadono Featured By Owner Jan 11, 2016  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Communists are eternal screechy ideological adolescents. People try to get into capitalist states. Virtually nobody fled to the Soviet block. People had to be locked into communist states. Most of the Soviet Bolshevik leadership themselves ended up being murdered by the very regime they created  - Bukharin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, Ezhov,  Yakoda, Beria....98 out of 139 central committee members, each one a communist true believer, all slaughtered by the people's communist state of the USSR. Be a commie, create a commie state, eventually your turn will come for the bullet, ice pick or death camp.

Mao, a vicious, fat old lunatic, caused even more innocent deaths in 20 odd years than Stalin.
Reply
:iconpatrioticparot:
PatrioticParot Featured By Owner Jan 12, 2016
Both of them are terrible ideologies. It's fucking stupid when someone tries to make one look perfect and the other stupid. It's like the damn console wars.
Reply
:iconfanjunkare:
Fanjunkare Featured By Owner Nov 7, 2015  Student
- Genocide
Reply
:iconnutcase9:
Nutcase9 Featured By Owner Oct 23, 2015  Student General Artist
The horror, the horror LOL
Reply
:iconbriannabater:
Briannabater Featured By Owner Oct 21, 2015  Professional Photographer
Ayep
Reply
:iconatlantahardcore:
AtlantaHardcore Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2015
If those are the evils, what are the benefits?


- Mass murder on massive scales not seen before or since

- Brutal political repression and censorship

- State control of everyday life

- Omnipresent cults of personality

- State ownership and control of the means of production AND the product of labor

- Complete inefficiency in almost any task undertaken by the state

- Pervasive shortages due to calculation problems and locked-in prices that can't communicate information regarding the supply of products

- Hyper-nationalism

- Militarism and belligerent foreign policy


Oh...
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2015
"Mass murder on massive scales not seen before or since"
Without trying Capitalism kills 16 million people every year, so not really a scale never seen since.
"Brutal political repression and censorship"
Boohoo, the oppressors became the oppressed.
"State control of everyday life"
As it does in every nation ever.
"Omnipresent cults of personality"
Except when they weren't present or promoted by the regime, which was quite often.
"State ownership and control of the means of production AND the product of labor"
So it can be planned and properly distributed, as opposed to given to rich people to sell for money.
"Complete inefficiency in almost any task undertaken by the state"
Excluding massive industrialization, elimination of illiteracy, doubling of life expectancy, and elimination of homelessness throughout the socialist world, the Soviet Space Program, WW2 and other extremely efficiently completed tasks.
"Pervasive shortages due to calculation problems and locked-in prices that can't communicate information regarding the supply of products"
When stupid amounts of consumer goods were made, which were pretty useless to Socialist Society and not meant for inclusion in the Economic system on such a large scale.
"Hyper-nationalism"
Excluding nearly every Socialist State ever.
"Militarism and belligerent foreign policy"
Excluding the fact that even the most well known militaristic "war monger" in the Socialist world (North Korea) has only been so militarized since the collapse of every dependable ally it had, and the fact that it only ever invaded one nation.
Reply
:iconatlantahardcore:
AtlantaHardcore Featured By Owner Oct 15, 2015
"Without trying Capitalism kills 16 million people every year, so not really a scale never seen since."
First off, I'm shitting on communism, not defending capitalism.  Secondly, with a few isolated but shameful exceptions, those deaths are largely side effects of capitalism, not deliberate mass exterminations, something communist governments have become infamous for.

"Boohoo, the oppressors became the oppressed."
I oppose oppression regardless of the victim.  However let's put the moral argument aside for a moment.  The oppressors become the oppressed, but almost none of the oppressed become the oppressors.  The oppressed stay the oppressed, only under a new governmental ruling class.

"As it does in every nation ever."
Which is why I'm an anarchist.

"Except when they weren't present or promoted by the regime, which was quite often."
And yet, the capability of creating one is always there.  Freedom under communism, as with any other government, depends largely on the whims of those in the political class.

"So it can be planned and properly distributed, as opposed to given to rich people to sell for money."
The planning and "proper" distribution led to shortages and famines.  Economies can't be planned and anyone who thinks they can is an arrogant fool.  If large corporations can't efficiently manage their internal economies without needing the capitalist state to subsidize their operating costs, there's no way in Hell a government can manage a national economy.  The best any country can't do for its economy is decentralize or, preferably, cease to exist.

"Excluding massive industrialization, elimination of illiteracy, doubling of life expectancy, and elimination of homelessness throughout the socialist world, the Soviet Space Program, WW2 and other extremely efficiently completed tasks."
The Soviet space program was held together with duct tape and witnessed the needless deaths of who know how many cosmonauts.  It's a perfect illustration of the USSR's complete disregard for human life (as if more proof were need).  As for the other things: No country has ever eliminated illiteracy or homelessness and no country ever will; life expectancy has been rising all over the world, including stateless Somalia; are you really going to cite WWII as example of why communism is awesome?  If wars of aggression are a measure of how well a system works, why not give a few kind words to capitalism.  It's effectively financed plenty of aggressive wars.

"When stupid amounts of consumer goods were made, which were pretty useless to Socialist Society and not meant for inclusion in the Economic system on such a large scale."
One of the "consumer goods" in question was food.  Kind of important.  By the way, what divine mandate gives communist bureaucrats the right to decide for others what's useless to them and what isn't?  Here again arises to the eternal problems of political authority and political legitimacy, both of which are myths.

"Excluding nearly every Socialist State ever."
Except the USSR, Nazi Germany, communist China, communist North Korea, communist Cuba, Venezuela, fascist Italy, fascist Spain...

"Excluding the fact that even the most well known militaristic "war monger" in the Socialist world (North Korea) has only been so militarized since the collapse of every dependable ally it had, and the fact that it only ever invaded one nation."
If we're talking about the present-day world, I'll freely concede that the United States is the second-most belligerent power in the world.  (The first is ISIS, if you consider them a power of some sort.)  North Korea's saber-rattling is mainly to get attention because they want to be taken seriously as a super power, rather than as the crazy cat lady of the international neighborhood that they so clearly are.
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Oct 17, 2015
"First off, I'm shitting on communism, not defending capitalism."
Doesn't like capitalism, but attacks the only viable, tested, proven, and working alternative. Seems legit.
"I oppose oppression regardless of the victim"
Well then when you've overthrown capitalism, the capitalists will wait a few years and overthrow you again. The Capitalist class won't give up it's power willingly, and will fight to take it back once they've lost it. The oppression exists for a reason.
"The oppressed stay the oppressed"
Hardly.
"Which is why I'm an anarchist."
Better than a fascist I guess.
"And yet, the capability of creating one is always there."
As it is in every political system. Even outside of politics.
"The planning and "proper" distribution led to shortages and famines."
The shortages occurred after the abandoning of correct planning, and the famines occurred when there wasn't enough food produced. Between those points it did pretty well.
"The Soviet space program was held together with duct tape and witnessed the needless deaths of who know how many cosmonauts"
7 Soviet Cosmonauts (excluding the single Russian Cosmonaut that died in training in 1993) died over the course of the Soviet Space program in spaceflight related accidents (and training). 23 American Astronauts and an Israeli Astronaut died in the course of the US Space program in spaceflight related accidents (and training), 15 before the fall of the USSR. That's a more than 100% higher fatality rate on the US Space program.
"No country has ever eliminated illiteracy or homelessness"
Most Socialist nations did. North Korea to this day still has a 100% literacy rate, and in Cuba it's 99.8% and those statistics are according to the CIA. Norway and Finland have eliminated illiteracy, and they aren't even Socialist (although they are left leaning). In Cuba home ownership is 85%, and the rest rent or stay with family, leading to a 0% Homelessness rate. As in literally no homeless people at all.
"life expectancy has been rising all over the world"
But only in the Socialist nations did it go up so quickly. Look at Albania under Socialism: Between 1945 and 1979 the life expectancy went up by 11 months per year.
"are you really going to cite WWII as example of why communism is awesome"
The Soviet Union won the war in Europe near single handedly. They did it fairly fast, and in an efficient manner. 
"wars of aggression are a measure of how well a system works"
WW2, Well known to have been started by the Soviets not the Germans.
"By the way, what divine mandate gives communist bureaucrats the right to decide for others what's useless to them and what isn't?"
All that is needed is the elimination of consumer culture: Do you need a new phone, or car every few months, or years? No, not really, you can get along fine with a phone for a few years, and a car for a decade or more. That's what is meant. 
"Except the USSR, Nazi Germany, communist China, communist North Korea, communist Cuba, Venezuela, fascist Italy, fascist Spain"
So of those, Cuba, the USSR, China during the Mao era, and North Korea are/were Socialist. Of those, North Korea is pretty nationalist. The USSR was a union of more than 15 nations, so the only really nationalist thing it did was promote the Russian language as a means of communication. China was extremely internationalist in the Mao era, and Cuba was and still is very much internationalist.
"get attention because they want to be taken seriously as a super power"
Not really. They usually only do it when they are provoked: large scale drills at the border, blasting propaganda into the North, and other such things.
Reply
:iconatlantahardcore:
AtlantaHardcore Featured By Owner Oct 17, 2015
"Doesn't like capitalism, but attacks the only viable, tested, proven, and working alternative. Seems legit."
1) Communism has been proven time and again to non-viable and brutal.  2) Communism is not the only alternative.  Mutualism and even anarcho-communism are far more viable.

"Well then when you've overthrown capitalism, the capitalists will wait a few years and overthrow you again. The Capitalist class won't give up it's power willingly, and will fight to take it back once they've lost it. The oppression exists for a reason."
The capitalist class would've have any power if the state didn't exist to prop it up.

"Hardly."
Ask a Ukrainian peasant how not-oppressed they were under communism.

"As it is in every political system. Even outside of politics."
The threat is way lower outside of politics.

"Most Socialist nations did. North Korea to this day still has a 100% literacy rate,"
According to North Korea.  Then again, maybe all of their illiterates have starved to death.  Even if that figure would true, it's ever so slightly marred by the fact that all of those people are being taught that the head of state is a god and if they question that "fact", they'll be sent to a camp for "re-education", sent to a labor camp to perform slave labor, or just murdered outright.  I would rather just have a few people stay illiterate.
"and in Cuba it's 99.8% and those statistics are according to the CIA. Norway and Finland have eliminated illiteracy, and they aren't even Socialist (although they are left leaning). In Cuba home ownership is 85%
"
Home ownership is at 85%, but no Cuban is legally allowed to stay at any of the fancy, foreigner-oriented, capitalist hotels the government profits off of.  Class divisions in Communist Cuba are more rigorously enforced than capitalist countries.
", and the rest rent or stay with family, leading to a 0% Homelessness rate. As in literally no homeless people at all."
If it sounds too good to be true...  Seriously, dude?  0% homelessness?  Not even one small group of crazy survivalists living in the woods with tin foil on their heads?

"But only in the Socialist nations did it go up so quickly. Look at Albania under Socialism: Between 1945 and 1979 the life expectancy went up by 11 months per year."
And what was the life expectancy of one who ran afoul of the ruling elites for any reason?  What was the life expectancy of someone living and working in a gulag?

"The Soviet Union won the war in Europe near single handedly."
Sure, if you don't count any other country's military campaigns against the Nazis.  Oh, and speaking of Nazis, there's that little matter of the Soviet Union being allies of Nazi Germany.
"They did it fairly fast, and in an efficient manner.
"
They did it fairly fast... after having lost a substantial amount of territory to the Nazis and more soldiers than all of the other sides combined.

"WW2, Well known to have been started by the Soviets not the Germans."
Does the word 'Afghanistan' ring any bells?  There's also the surrogate wars throughout the Cold War.  And like I said, the Soviets helped the Nazis up until they were betrayed by them.

"All that is needed is the elimination of consumer culture: Do you need a new phone, or car every few months, or years? No, not really, you can get along fine with a phone for a few years, and a car for a decade or more. That's what is meant. "
And who are you to decide what other people need?  If you want to eliminate consumer culture, work to change people's minds about it.  The second you use violence or coercion (which are all a state is, in the end) to force that change, you've crossed a line.  You've become just another oppressor who should be torn down.

"So of those, Cuba, the USSR, China during the Mao era, and North Korea are/were Socialist. Of those, North Korea is pretty nationalist."
North Korea is hyper-nationalist.
"The USSR was a union of more than 15 nations, so the only really nationalist thing it did was promote the Russian language as a means of communication."
"Promote" is such a nicer word than 'impose'.
"China was extremely internationalist in the Mao era,"
If you ignore the Party leadership's ruthless attempts to suppress Western intellectual and cultural influences.
"and Cuba was and still is very much internationalist.
"
In as much as the Cuban government happily accepts international tourists' money, all while maintaining private property for international corporations that the average Cubans could never hope to lay even one toe on.  Are you seriously defending a regime like that?  Honestly, why are you even a communist?  As long as it's a communist government doing it, you seem perfectly comfortable defending acts of mass economic exploitation, class reinforcement, and the many other horrors of state communism that make life a living hell for workers and everyone else living under it (except the party leaders, of course.  They get wealthy).
Reply
:iconmclj10:
mclj10 Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2015
"1) Communism has been proven time and again to non-viable and brutal.  2) Communism is not the only alternative.  Mutualism and even anarcho-communism are far more viable."
It worked excellently in nations that correctly applied Socialism, and still worked pretty damn well in those that didn't. It's produced a large number of people throughout Eastern Europe that want it's return, and I can source that if you want. Anarchism and such worked in small areas for a few years at the most. Communist lead Socialism advanced half the globe for half a century. 
"The capitalist class would've have any power if the state didn't exist to prop it up."
They would have all restrictions on their power removed, and be able to replicate all the tools of the capitalist state for their own personal use. They would have even more power.
"Ask a Ukrainian peasant how not-oppressed they were under communism."
56% of them say the breakup of the USSR was a bad thing, so.....
"According to North Korea."
According to the CIA. I litterally said that in the post. The CIA is hardly a pro-North Korea organisation, and it doesn't use their statistics. 
"no Cuban is legally allowed to stay at any of the fancy, foreigner-oriented, capitalist hotels the government profits off of. Class divisions in Communist Cuba are more rigorously enforced than capitalist countries."
They don't let locals into hotels made specifically for foreigners, because they are hotels made specifically for foreigners. Yes, the government does profit off them, they introduced some capitalistic reforms as so they can buy stuff abroad, which they need money for, especially considering the complete collapse of nearly all of their former trading partners 20 years ago. It's not a class division at all. 
"If it sounds too good to be true..."
It doesn't to most people that have been to Cuba, or to most multinational groups. Literally Google "Cuba Homelessness" and there is a long list of article on the lack of homelessness in Cuba.
"What was the life expectancy of someone living and working in a gulag?"
No idea about Albania, but in the USSR according to available data about 1 million of the 14 million people that went through the Gulag system died in it. So according to some basic maths about 93% chance of survival.
"Sure, if you don't count any other country's military campaigns against the Nazis."
No, the war in Europe was effectively nearly all the Soviet Union. Between 1941 and 1943 the entirety of the combat in Europe between regular armies was the Soviets fighting the Axis powers. Even when the rest of the Allies jumped in the Germans were defeated. The Germans were defeated as soon as their advanced in the East stopped.
"They did it fairly fast... after having lost a substantial amount of territory"
Which is expected. They fought from behind, they wore them down, the encircled pockets of their advance, they needed the Germans in their ground to defeat them, to stretch their supply lines, and to slow their advance. The only way to fight a Blitzkrieg is to let them in, but wear them down until they lose momentum, at that point the enemy is already as good as defeated.
"and more soldiers than all of the other sides combined."
Not really. Combined Japanese and German losses are about the same as the Soviet. The Soviets only lost 2 Soldiers to every dead German Soldier, which isn't too bad in the grand scale of things. 
"Does the word 'Afghanistan' ring any bells?"
What? The nation where the US essentially created Islamic Terrorism by funding Islamic groups to fight a legitimate state which requested Soviet help fighting the Islamic groups, and then went on to invade later just for the bants?
"If you want to eliminate consumer culture, work to change people's minds about it."
Which is exactly what the Socialist State will do.
"another oppressor who should be torn down."
Yes, the Socialist state oppresses those who oppressed. Deal with it. Welcome to the Dictatorship of the Proletariat.
"If you ignore the Party leadership's ruthless attempts to suppress Western intellectual and cultural influences."
Not really. They suppressed anything they considered too bourgeois, that included Western culture, but a considerable amount of Chinese Culture, much more than Western.
"Blah blah Cuba blah"
Internationalist in the sense that they send out armies of doctors throughout the world to nations in need, and assisted a number of African nations in their fight for independence.
Reply
:iconatlantahardcore:
AtlantaHardcore Featured By Owner Oct 18, 2015
You're either trolling or delusional.  Either way, I'm done with you, just like historical fact is done with communism.
Reply
:iconatlantahardcore:
AtlantaHardcore Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2015
Sorry.  Dealing with it and rap music have both been banned by the Party's leadership for being counter-revolutionary.  I'm afraid you'll have to be eliminated.  Prepare to be airbrushed out of your own selfies.
Reply
:icondovahkiinhu3br:
DovahkiinHU3BR Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2015
I was showing how you epicly said "inform yourselkf before crictizing" to this communist idiot.
Reply
:iconatlantahardcore:
AtlantaHardcore Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2015
I can dig it.  ^_^
Reply
:icondovahkiinhu3br:
DovahkiinHU3BR Featured By Owner Oct 11, 2015
Thanks :)
Reply
:iconfullyoverspeed:
FullyOverspeed Featured By Owner Sep 16, 2015
Man, all of these are not communist's point, the reason of these things happened in ussr was like to use a machine without reading the instructions correctly
Reply
:iconpootis9999:
Pootis9999 Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2015  Student Writer
Yeah, it just happened in all the countries that were communist had all of those bonuses. Totally just coincidence. Definitely wouldn't happen again. 
Reply
:iconfullyoverspeed:
FullyOverspeed Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2015
It did not happen at Cuba, so did not in Yugoslavia when Tito was there. Did not happen in China after it cut off the relation with USSR. Other countries? Those "nations" under USSR's control were just some copies of "soviet style" which were considered as unsuccessful practicing of communism EVEN between communist ourselves. And what do you think about those like three times of failure when French were going to have capitalism revolution? They ultimately formed a steady republic after times and times of trying, did they?
Reply
:icondovahkiinhu3br:
DovahkiinHU3BR Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2015
"It did not happen at Cuba" inform yourself before crictizing you fool.
Reply
:iconfullyoverspeed:
FullyOverspeed Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2015
Alright let's forget about Cuba that was my mistake,but it was still a country controlled by USSR so it was a "soviet style" nation. As the original theory of Marxism the communist should take place at a nation with enough capital, but none of those communist nation were suited for this title,
and those other nations which does owned the capital have already driven the communist out of the country violently by around the 30~60s
Reply
:icondovahkiinhu3br:
DovahkiinHU3BR Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2015
So you support freedom, justice, equality IF THE COUNTRY HAS ENOUGH CAPITAL, where the State will give good education and security?
Reply
:iconfullyoverspeed:
FullyOverspeed Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2015
A nation with enough capital can practice communism much easier than those which doesn't. Like the conflicts inside the Russia, China or any other communist nation's society was much more than western world
Reply
(2 Replies)
:iconsurfinstalin:
SurfinStalin Featured By Owner Aug 21, 2015
Thank you, Robert Conquest
Reply
:iconal3ssio97:
Al3ssio97 Featured By Owner Jul 18, 2015
same in a democratic state or in a fascist state
Reply
:iconseerofheros:
seerofheros Featured By Owner Jul 13, 2015  Hobbyist Photographer
It's a case if good in theory but bad in practice. Good hopes but in this current world it just cannot be done
Reply
:iconkamithegodwolf:
KamitheGodwolf Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
How about the ban of everything different? Also, Communism has been tried before... Look how that went. :) 
Reply
:iconchrisclinejax:
chrisclinejax Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2015
here is one
Reply
:iconwillcraft:
willcraft Featured By Owner Jun 2, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
Mass murder, lack of respect for individuals, uniformity, repression of dissent and more mass murder.
Reply
:iconanupespe:
anupespe Featured By Owner Mar 23, 2015  Hobbyist Interface Designer
+1
Reply
:iconuserup:
userup Featured By Owner Mar 11, 2015
Crappy health care

Mediorce education

No regards to human rights

A soceity where everyone is poor
Reply
:icondovahkiinhu3br:
DovahkiinHU3BR Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2015
"A soceity where everyone is poor" you mean "A soceity where everyone that is not a member of the government is poor", right?
Reply
:iconuserup:
userup Featured By Owner Oct 7, 2015
Or the military.
Reply
:icondovahkiinhu3br:
DovahkiinHU3BR Featured By Owner Oct 8, 2015
Yeah sure.
Reply
:iconkajm:
Kajm Featured By Owner Mar 8, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
It worked SO well in Cuba, the USSR, China, Viet Nam... pretty much anywhere communism is practiced or had been before it collapsed under its' own weight as the elitists at the top took everything for themselves.
Reply
:iconarcn7:
ARCN7 Featured By Owner Apr 19, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I bet in around 20 years it will be you sitting in a cramped refugee-boat to Cuba, hoping to get away because what you describe there is happening now in the USA. Guess why North Korea still stands? And Cuba? Because of brutal repression? Yes, sure Kim-Jong Un would totally try to starve a population that is armed to the teeth with private weaponry ranging from AK's to Artillery and trained to use it.
The small nations with the best models of socialism survived the collapse in the '90s and will still stand when the USA and Canada devolve into fascism.
Have fun in the orwellian future of Capitalism.
Reply
:iconpootis9999:
Pootis9999 Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2015  Student Writer
If North Korea is so good, why not move there?
Reply
:iconarcn7:
ARCN7 Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2015  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Guess what, they are kind of paranoid of foreign infiltrators...
By the way: Why do all anti-communists always tell me to just move there ? Why don't libertarians and "true capitalists" just move to Somalia?
Reply
:iconpootis9999:
Pootis9999 Featured By Owner Oct 4, 2015  Student Writer
Than China's an option. It is also communist.
Reply
:iconkajm:
Kajm Featured By Owner Apr 19, 2015  Hobbyist Writer
BWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Reply
:iconcrystalmv:
CrystalMV Featured By Owner Feb 28, 2015
Oh yeah, creating a society where everyone is considered equally useless, regardless of their race and sex, and gets free public education that tells them how useless they are. If you were one of those anarcho-communist hippies who are just a little deluded not for realizing what makes the current system broken, I could get along with you, but seeing you're down with the soviet pussies, there ain't nothing good I could expect from you.

I see you have anarchist communists among your watchers, and I don't understand how anyone could be that deluded. I mean, how could any anarchist be okay with the shit which Soviet Union has done? As anarcho-capitalist, I'd rather expect them to accept the system where they actually are allowed to create collectivist groups with shared property (which they could freely do in anarcho-capitalism) rather than the system where they would be treated as trash.

Not only that, but I also avoid misusing the word 'communism'. I avoid using it to refer to totalitarian dictatorships that hijacked the word. I avoid bringing the undeserved hate upon communism, so at least I do something good for real communists.

Also, the way you use the word 'fascist' is very offensive, it's just the way the soviets say 'nigger'. That's how the soviets used to refer to their slaves. Sure, it's okay to use any word in a non-derogatory way, such as "yo, what's crackin', ma' fascist?" or "how's it goin', ma' nigga?", but that's not how you use it.
Reply
:iconwarboss-skrutch:
Warboss-Skrutch Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2015  Hobbyist General Artist
I prefer to be equal in capitalist country, than dead in communist one.

True capitalist to the soul, 'till the bullet hole.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
September 30, 2013
Image Size
1.6 MB
Resolution
763×935
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
9,156 (1 today)
Favourites
171 (who?)
Comments
563
Downloads
67
×