| Deviant Login | Shop | Join deviantART for FREE  |
Take the Tour  |
#communism
#PoliticsAreParanoid
#OccupyDA
#OccupyArtists
| Digital Art / Other / Political | ©2013 ~Party9999999 |
The Journal Portal
Browse Journals |
Polls |
deviantART [dee·vee·un'nt·ART]
Keep in Touch!
|
Deviousness `ChewedKandi has certainly gone out of her way to keep the vector community on the right path. Always making sure that her talents are infinitely scalable, Sharon has put her bezier curves to excellent use, and firmly anchored herself as an inspirational leader. We're absolutely delighted to bestow the Deviousness Award for June 2013 to `ChewedKandi. Congratulations, Sharon! Read More
|
Sta.sh
For example --
A hammer is not good nor bad. You can build a fence or bash someones skull in, but a hammer is not exclusive to one or the other.
Gun Powder is not good nor bad. Pretty fireworks, deadly bombs. Gun Powder is not exclusive.
The real trap is society tricking us into believing in one singular definition of a label and then tricking us into thinking we need to fit ourselves into the box of the label. Those who control the meanings of labels, control all who believe in the label. The tools become the wielder of the human.
I think we just need to stop the judgemental absolutist attitude the joke of an educational system indoctrinates us into with its deceptions.
There is no "the context of a right wing talking point" but you have pointed out "a" context of a "potential right wing talking point probability".
For you see, right wing and left wing are not so absolute as we've been tricked into thinking. I am what they call a political anomaly. Middle path. Centered. I allow myself my individuality which means, I can simultaneously agree and disagree with both the right and the left, because I refuse to put myself in either of those limiting boxes.
I also see right and left as two points of contrast and everything between those two points is measurable and creates so much variety and it is all of this variety which hides in plain sight, in the fog of our complacency.
For example, Government is Latin for Mind Control. Democracy is Latin for Rule of Mafia. Now, someone might assume that government only has the one standard societal spoon-fed definition and one might also assume that democracy also has the singular absolute societal spoon-fed definition; however this assumption is the right to a persons free will choice to make the assumption, it is not an absolute static reality which applies to all humans
Now lets say hypothetically, there was such a thing as a word with only one definition. That definition will be filtered through the paradigm filter of individuality. 7 billion people will see that one thing, in 7 billion different ways.
I've always said that if we could get 7 billion people to agree on any one thing, they would have 7 billion different reasons for agreeing and then proceed to fight over whose one singular absolute reason is supposedly right