Of all the assassination-victims in the United States during the 1960s, Malcomlm X is -- by far -- the one who I am most curious to know how his life would have unfolded and what his ideas would be about contemporary issues and personalities.
These words are true about our liberal media, they just love to blame the oppressed rather than the people actually being oppressed, it's just sad really, I just wish they actually get a life instead of ruining the ones of people who's lives have already been harmed.
I wasn't really talking about the tea-party, while ignorance has made things a bit more difficult for people to listen to us, that's not the reason I said what I said. The liberal media is also being ignorant about the oppressions caused by communism and Sharia Law as well, and also making Israel look like the bad guy when all it's trying to do is protect it's people. As well as shielding terrorists and doing whatever it takes to make America look like the monster of the world when it is the exact opposite.
While you do raise some interesting points, one part of your arguement confuses me;
if by "liberal media" you mean all non-Fox news sources within the US, how can they demonize america for the rest of the world when America is the audience?
That said, consider this; whenever homeless aid and unemployment aid come up for debate, the neo-cons claim that all (or at least the vast majority) of the unemployed are moochers and leeches. That seems like a pretty clean-cut example of the oppressed being represented as the problem. Not to mention the attacks on women's rights by the neo-cons; forcing a rape victim to give birth because of some perverse 19th century myth about her "wanting it" (yes, some idiot politicians are that stupid) seems to, again, be another example.
As for your Isreal example, you do have a point; Isreal does have a right to protect it's people. That said, breaking treaties by encroaching on what little territory the Palestinians have left and evicting the residents doesn't garner much sympathy (hell, I'm Jewish and I can see that the issue isn't clear-cut).
Finally; how, pray tell, is the liberal media shielding terrorists? I'm curious about what you mean. Seriously. Is this a gitmo thing?
You do realize that Hamas has been breaking treaty after treaty right? And attacking Israelis as well as firing missiles from Palestinian civilian areas, Do you really find it surprising that the Israelis are on edge, losing this fight would mean the death of every Israeli and Israeli supporter in the country. Hamas already promised that to happen if they win. And the same is true for all the other countries under Sharia rule.
You mean you don't know? Whenever they get the chance, liberal media like NBC like to support the terrorists, like remember the Gaza missile attack, they got the part where Israel launched a missile there, but they didn't mention once that Hamas launched a missile from the civilian area and launched it in Tel Aviv. Also, the presidents apology run, where he apologized to the Sharia World for "America's oppressive attacks" when really because of their constant terrorist attacks we had to take action, he was praised by the liberals. And let's not forget Benghazi, when four Americans were dead, instead of acknowledging to everyone that it was a terrorist attack led by Ansar Al-Sharia and Al-Qaeda. While Obama and the liberals blamed the video "Innocence of Muslims" instead it was actually a planned attack by those terrorist organizations. Is there any more evidence I need to present?
I don't mean all non-Fox sources, I just mean ones like NBC, they do demonize American ideals when given the chance, and quite often like to pull the racist card when something doesn't go their way, and the audience is America but they want to convince people that how they're changing America will make it better, when the reality is that it won't.
By neo-cons, do you mean conservatives? I'm sorry to disappoint you, but the neo-cons are a very small minority of the conservatives, in fact conservatives want to help the poor too, in fact more so, conservatives have even donated more money into helping the poor than liberals. It's just the views on helping them are different, while neo-liberals believe in helping the poor with more government power, the conservatives help the poor without government involvement, which is something the IRS has obviously been against seeing how they have targeted Conservative and Christian donation groups. First, you do realize out of all abortion patients that only 4% percent of them were raped right? Second, is that really an excuse to refuse a child to be able to have a life, the mother doesn't have to keep the child, she could give the child to an adoption center where some loving family will take care of him/her. But I would not consider abortion an option because the child is alive. Don't believe me, then tell me, why do abortion patients need 2 hours in an abortion clinic when an abortion takes only a few minutes? The answer is that the patient will need the rest of the time for counseling, but why? Because causing death is a lot to take in. And if that's not enough then hear this, during an abortion an ultrasound saw what was going on inside the mother's womb, what it sawwas horibble, the baby was screaming, you couldn't hear it, and it was wriggling around, trying to escape the thing that was tearing it to pieces . So, you tell me, are we "infringing" on women's rights, or protecting a living child who deserves to at least have a chance at life.
You know about BBC's latest ramble of how "dancing" and "aerobic" classes have popped up in the midst of an anti-China protest in Hanoi, Vietnam, in an apparent ploy by the government to break up the event. And if you live in Hanoi at least a month, you'll find out that the people there were doing their everyday exercise, and had very little to do with the government.
Just wonder how many people would lap that shit up until BBC removed it.